Many thanks, yes -- is Qpid Proton. If I am to select, I prefer the library that gives more control and low level access. This is due to nature of my application. I just needed a confirmation that C or C++ are good candidates for long term.
thanks again, Adrian On Wed, May 13, 2020, 12:13 PM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 14:45, Adrian Florea <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to ask the group about the continuity and stability of these > > client libraries. > > > > Is there any preferrence or tendency to favor C or C++ clients for future > > development ? > > I assume you mean Qpid Proton in both cases, but for clarity, is that > actually the case? > > What you might want to use use will in part depend what you intend to > do with it, as they arent necessarily directly equivalent. Proton's C > bits tend to be lower level, while the C++ binding bits sit a bit > higher on top of its C bits. For regular client usage you are likely > to prefer the C++ binding I expect. > > > > > Will adopting the C client be a safe choice, or C++ should be the client > of > > choice ? > > > > This is about introducing AMQP support in a large application, C++/C, > Linux > > native. > > > > I am doing some research and so far I am focused around Qpid, as the > client > > of choice. > > > > If anyone has more visibility into the future plans, please share. > > > > > > many thanks, > > Adrian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
