-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10-08-12 21:14, Robby Findler wrote: > That gets us to within a factor of 2 or 3 of the go version, I > guess?
If the 1 minute versus 1 second is accurate, then there was a 60x performance difference in the beginning and Matthew managed to improve it by a factor of 5 or even slightly over 6 when tuning, so it seems to me Racket would still be slower by 10x. Marijn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAozM0ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2z3JACfTvfn6BV9DQNKpxho6JenDobo N7YAn2GhhDTBB31wM12Naw+Jrl1nV+rs =wbzg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
