Yesterday, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Ah of course. The following still gives me the error though? Is this
> supposed to happen?
>
> #lang racket
>
> (require racket/sandbox)
>
> (parameterize ([sandbox-output #f]
> [sandbox-error-output #f]
> [sandbox-propagate-exceptions #f]
> [sandbox-propagate-breaks #f])
> (make-evaluator 'racket '(/ 1 0)))
Probably not -- but that's a relatively new parameter, which might
need more work. Before this parameter, the principle of a sandbox was
that the evaluation happens inside the protected box, and you get its
results whether they're values or exceptions.
(BTW, I'm not sure if that parameter is a good idea -- I think that a
better one would be some way to make the sandbox more completely
segregated, with both values and exceptions done via only its IO.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
