Yesterday, Stephen Chang wrote: > Ah of course. The following still gives me the error though? Is this > supposed to happen? > > #lang racket > > (require racket/sandbox) > > (parameterize ([sandbox-output #f] > [sandbox-error-output #f] > [sandbox-propagate-exceptions #f] > [sandbox-propagate-breaks #f]) > (make-evaluator 'racket '(/ 1 0)))
Probably not -- but that's a relatively new parameter, which might need more work. Before this parameter, the principle of a sandbox was that the evaluation happens inside the protected box, and you get its results whether they're values or exceptions. (BTW, I'm not sure if that parameter is a good idea -- I think that a better one would be some way to make the sandbox more completely segregated, with both values and exceptions done via only its IO.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users