Three hours ago, Daniel Prager wrote: > Thanks Greg and Sam > > #lang scribble/html > @a[href: "http://www.racket-lang.org" > title: "Racket the Ultimate"]{Racket} > > After reading a comment in the source I tried @[:href > "foo.html"]{bar} and even @[href "foo.html"]{bar} before turning to > the list.
Any `foo:' in the code (for a `foo:' that is otherwise unbound) is used as an attribute on applications of xml-generating constructs. I originally played with having the usual racket keywords, but eventually decided that it's best to keep the two facilities separate, in case there are some xml-like uses that require different functionality than keywords -- like a particular order or duplicate keywords. > BTW: For others playing with this: "@mdash" -> "—" etc. Yeah, some of the entities that seems to be popular are defined, but not all of them. You can see the definitions in "html.rkt" -- the `define/provide-entities' expression. Supporting all of them would be problematic, since there are a *lot* of names there, including things like `not', `and', `pi', and others. You can also use things like @entity{blah}, @entity['blah], or @entity[123]. But I think that it's overall best to use the character in the code in most cases, unless you need the entities for some reason (as in some weird xslt cases). -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users