Yes and no. Too many delays to get started. After getting access and getting familar with new wiki. Couldn't find user feature in lists, only architecture features.
Guess I've lost any interest in creating. Bill On May 3, 2012 8:48 PM, "Sean Cooper" <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill & Matt > > Has there been any progress on this effort? > > -Sean > > >Hi Bill, > > > >I think this is an important step. We have been talking about creating a > r= > >oadmap, and even taken some steps; but, nothing is codified yet. =20 > > > >If you have time to consolidate all of the feature requests on the wiki, > th= > >at would be very helpful. > > > >We started a page of architecture topics, but feel free to create other > pag= > >es. If you don't have permission to create a page, let us know and we > can = > >create one for you (I am still getting used to MoinMoin, so am not > familiar= > > with its authorization layer). > > > >Thanks, > > > >-Matt > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Bill Donaldson [mailto:[email protected]] > >>Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 10:46 PM > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: PROPOSAL: Rave Roadmap > >> > >>Apoorv Durga from The Real Story Group posted an article on Rave. > >>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2317-Rave-Becomes-a-New-Apache- > >>Portal-Project > >> > >>The point that I think the community should is the lack of a roadmap. > >>On the dev list there have been many a lot of meta discussions on > >>creating a roadmap and many proposals. This hasn't created a clear > >>set of capabilities that would be required for a 1.0 release. > >> > >>Proposal - On the Rave wiki create two pages Roadmap & proposals > >> > >>I can troll the dev list for the features for the 1.0 release and the > >>latest set of proposals. > >> > >>I believe this will help the development community BUT the real value > >>will be to help the user community get involved and inform them of > >>where the project is going. > >> > >>Bill >
