Hi,
I hate so helpful community proposal sinked :-) Thanks @Zongyang, IMO, it’s time to introduce more effective feature request mechanism for Apache RocketMQ. I will make more comments on the proposal and very glad to hear other PMCs sounds. Has anyone issued XXIP for other Apache TLP Project? Let’s make the RIP more smoothly. Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2018年8月9日，16:15，Xiao Zongyang <xiaozongyang_b...@qq.com> 写道： > > Dear Apache RocketMQ Community > > When we want the Apache RocketMQ project we propose an ISSUE with feature > request on Github. It's a nice way for request but not very formal and easy > to trace and manage. So I suggest that we should introduce the RIP(RocketMQ > Improvement Proposal) mechanism to replace current Feature Request Process. > > So here are some key issues we need to discuss and make consensus. > 1. What is RIP? Why we need RIP? > 2. the Process and Status of a RIP > 3. How do we cooperate in RIP way to request or offer a feature? > 4. Should we provide a RIP template? What is the RIP template? > > > The answers to above questions are included in my draft, so let's make these > document better. > > The illustration and template of RIP are now available on Google Doc, links > are: > - RocketMQ Improvement Proposals: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vL2oRu2P4WiR0biHU__PemkrMDObXAa4Xw-I0gljyVg/edit?usp=sharing > - RIP Template: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19JssoEGnNp1x9MoXVMoeGCWSBnBdyv97FuGcIH1fV1g/edit?usp=sharing > > Comments, suggestions and editing are welcome! > > ---- > Best regards > Zongyang
