Hi,

    After going through the samples, I have a question about the consumer. 
    There are 2 consumer demos, SimpleMQConsumer and SimpleOrderConsumer, which 
are both push consumers. Is there any kind of pull consumer available?
I remember that there is a pull consumer in rocketmq-openmessaging.

Best Regards.
William

 
From: heng du
Date: 2019-07-02 16:22
To: users
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]Introduce a lightweight Apache RocketMQ client
Hi, all,

Thanks for providing great advice, and I’m happy to share a very lightweight 
client that the community has contributed 
(https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-ons). 

Compared to previous clients, this SDK brings great ease of use, and just as 
@wenfeng suggested that the new SDK removed the admin interfaces for 
management. Moreover, the new SDK 
hides the underlying implementation details and provides a minimal 
configuration for quickly creating a client.

Detailed usage can be found here: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-ons/tree/master/ons-sample. 

Best Regards.
Henry


wenfeng wang <[email protected]> 于2019年6月17日周一 下午8:22写道:
The current version of RocketMQ, maybe for code reusing (my understanding), the 
many admin implementations are included in the client package, and client 
package was encapsulated by admin. Which make a lot of additional complexity in 
the client package, and less clear semantics for the implementation.

So, I think a separation of client and admin is necessary. About new admin 
command tools, I have a piece of advice we could build it in Go, Go Client 
project has implemented full RocketMQ Protocol, and Go can be compiled into an 
executable binary program of any platform. 

About API abstraction, I think we should hide the internal concepts and 
implementation details as much as possible, and avoid Override, which can 
reduce the learning cost of users, and improve the usability. In configuration, 
minimize configuration items and make the default configuration cover more 
scenarios as many as possible.

李澍 <[email protected]> 于2019年6月17日周一 上午10:51写道:
+1
I'm happy to hear this, it's a good news for new users.


-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"zhong Malcolm" <[email protected]>
发送时间:2019-06-14 19:24:47 (星期五)
收件人: [email protected]
抄送: 
主题: Re: [DISCUSS]Introduce a lightweight Apache RocketMQ client

赞同

徐江 <[email protected]> 于2019年6月11日周二 上午10:12写道:
good idea, for new users, they just want to use it work well very quickly, they 
want to see it can produce and consume success quickly, 
don't want to see so many parameters, so many APIs.


At 2019-06-04 12:26:54, "heng du" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear RocketMQ Community,

In order to enhance the usability of RocketMQ, a simple client API seems to be 
introduced into RocketMQ to further reduce the user threshold and lowering the 
probability of making mistakes.

Compared With RocketMQ's origin client, the new client can be seen as a more 
high-level API that not only provides a better abstraction, but also removes 
some dangerous interfaces, hides more implementation details, and reduces A 
cumbersome configuration. At the same time, the original client will be 
retained as a low-level API to meet the additional needs of some experienced 
users, providing higher control ability for them.

In the cloud-native era, messaging middleware improvements should not only be 
stayed in the use of cloud features (elasticity, scalability, etc.), but more 
importantly, it can provide users with a more concise and easy-to-use API to 
shield the difference  brought by different cloud vendors or different 
deployment methods , so I think this should also be a focus of the follow-up 
development of RocketMQ. 

Looking forward to hearing your voice.

Best Regards,
Henry


 

Reply via email to