+1, I checked Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
ShannonDing <[email protected]>写道： > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for version 1.2.4 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP. > > The artifacts: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/1.2.4-rc1/ > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/1.2.4 > > Hash for the release tag: > > bc369cdb1ffbe0dc710d8359c28ec36f4b94188c > > Release Notes: > > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-1.2.4/ > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > BBC3FBA877D30832E2FBC8F901B994150CD1E262, which can be found in the keys file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. > > Fill in the following: > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [] The code can be built success in the source package. > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this > email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > [] +1 approve > > [] +0 no opinion > > [] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team > > > >
