Hi, tiger lee,

I find the source package at apache release SVN repository
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.6-rc1/rocketmq-client-java-5.0.6-source-release.zip
differs from github release/tag
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/archive/refs/tags/java-5.0.6.zip

How can we ensure the consistency? For example, source package in SVN
repository has this file 'rocketmq-client-java-parent-5.0.6/DEPENDENCIES'
while there is no such file in the git repository.

Zhanhui Li

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 9:38 PM aaron ai <aaro...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> tiger lee <tiger...@apache.org>于2024年1月22日 周一21:30写道:
>
>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>
>> This is the vote for gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.6 RC1.
>>
>> Apache RocketMQ gRPC clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
>> <https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis>;, and are built on top of
>> Protocol
>> Buffer and gRPC.
>>
>> The artifact url:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.6-rc1/
>>
>> The staging repo for maven:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1249/
>>
>> Git tag for the release:
>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.6
>>
>> Hash for the release tag:
>> 5ea91c3a23616cd7e1cc36c6a1dc753d8ab58dd3
>>
>> Release Notes:
>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.6
>>
>> The artifact have been signed with
>> Key: F32A2D46, which can be found in the
>> keys file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>
>> Fill in the following:
>>
>> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
>> necessary
>> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> of votes are reached.
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>> Thanks
>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>
>

Reply via email to