Peter,

You have mention about monthChaned event. I didn't check myself, but in
most of our components we are using only change event. It is probably quite
common event in html world - What actually is doing change event in
DateChooser? Maybe that is the answer for all changes?

Thanks, Piotr

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:14 Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote:

> After looking over what you want, I think this isn't falling into the PAYG
> philosophy. Most users of DateChooser won't need to dispatch a
> monthChanged event. The thing to do is subclass the DateChooserView and
> make that dispatch the monthChanged event.
>
> The Basic package is supposed to deliver the most common features with the
> least overhead. Sometimes the code we/I wrote isn't as performant as it
> could be, so that would be a PAYG improvement to make it smaller or faster
> (or there could be a bug in that an event that is supposed to be
> dispatched isn't). But adding more events and properties just enlarges the
> components which is not PAYG.
>
> If you think a particular property or event would benefit every user of
> the component, then we can have a discussion about adding that to Basic.
>
> On the other hand, the Express version of DateChooser could be extended to
> extras (like a monthChanged event) out of the box. And this probably is
> true of other requests for DateChooser. The Express package is meant to be
> a quicker way to get started with Royale since a number of the components
> there have more beads and features packaged into them; Express is not PAYG
> in that sense.
>
> We can also consider creating another package that tries to mimic old Flex
> as closely as possible.
>
> The bottom line is, we want to keep Basic really basic and provide the
> underpinnings for creating a fast and fluid application, adding to it only
> when and where necessary. A lot of that may fall onto the shoulders of app
> developers, more so than it did with Flex.
>
> ‹peter
>
> On 10/26/17, 4:46 AM, "doug777" <doug777...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hey Justin,
> >
> >That's fantastic. Big thank-you from me.
> >
> >Doug
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Sent from:
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-roy
> >ale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com
> %2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce6634fbdf06c4f411e7508d
> >51c4e1b43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446044150566225&
> >sdata=CjeJaHA3joQpC3ChCzaix7%2BZvg97Gm3P5lSUXwZlBBw%3D&reserved=0
>
>

Reply via email to