Hi Greg, yes.
I did a production deployment over 6 months ago and it worked. I had in mind to 
look for "that point" in the repository and maybe it's already time... I don't 
usually give up, but I lack the knowledge to solve this, I'm bugging and 
bugging Harb and I've done 1000000 tests without success.

Right now I'm debugging App.js, as suggested by Harb, and what I've discovered 
so far is that "other models", also located in the modules [1] of my library, 
are loaded correctly (crux)

[1] I don't use modules like Roman, I use Maven modules and, like you, I have a 
hierarchy of pom's

Hiedra

De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com>
Enviado el: jueves, 30 de diciembre de 2021 23:23
Para: users@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Compiling Modules (was Re: Load time is very slow)


Sorry I have not been following these threads in detail because I have been 
(and am currently still) on vacation.
AFAIK royale modules are not reliable in release mode. I don't know anyone who 
has had experience otherwise. I did try testing them some time ago and that was 
my experience, and I believe we had similar feedback from others in the 
community (who were early users) that it was working for them in the debug 
build, but not the release build.

Perhaps it can work in very simple cases in release builds, but beyond that I 
think the work on them is not complete. If there are others in the community 
whose experience is different and can confirm that things are working for them 
in release builds, please let us know.

Maria, it is also possible that in your case, that use of Crux inside modules 
is another layer of complexity in release mode, because I did not test that 
when I did the original work on Crux. Was this working at some point in the 
past and it has now stopped working?




On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:10 AM Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes.

On Thu, 30 Dec 2021, 23:03 Harbs, 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Did you apply the input_file options to the module?


On Dec 30, 2021, at 11:42 PM, Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:


I have applied the js compiler option as follows

<additionalCompilerOptions>-source-map=false;-compiler.show-binding-warnings=false;-js-default-initializers=true;-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;
            -js-compiler-option=--variable_map_output_file 
gccvars.txt;-js-compiler-option+=--property_map_output_file gccprops.txt
          </additionalCompilerOptions>


I get the same error as before when attempting to launch the jewel module.

<image.png>


Same error trace.

Uncaught TypeError: cm.valuesImpl.init is not a function
    at Rr.Mr.yl (Overview.js:786)
    at Function.iq.generateMXMLProperties (Overview.js:736)
    at Rr.hq.generateMXMLAttributes (Overview.js:546)
    at new Rr (Overview.js:804)
    at LN.J.loadHandler (FrontEnd.js:1967)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1640 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at oM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1640)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
3Overview.js:56 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined 
(reading 'prototype')
    at P (Overview.js:56)
    at SG.convert (FrontEnd.js:904)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:248)
    at HTMLElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:56 PM Harbs 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
1. I’d get rid of the agressive minification options. It will likely cause 
issues. If you get it to work without those options, you can try to add them 
back in and see if it still works.
2. You seem to be missing the compiler options explained here: 
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/modules#minification

For a pom, it would look something like this (adjust your paths to match your 
setup):

Main app:
<additionalCompilerOptions>-source-map=true;-js-compiler-option=--variable_map_output_file
 gccvars.txt;-js-compiler-option+=--property_map_output_file 
gccprops.txt</additionalCompilerOptions>

Module:
<additionalCompilerOptions>-source-map=true;-js-compiler-option=--variable_map_input_file
 
../../../../../MainApp/bin/js-release/gccvars.txt;-js-compiler-option+=--property_map_input_file
 ../../../../../MainApp/bin/js-release/gccprops.txt</additionalCompilerOptions>

On Dec 30, 2021, at 7:43 PM, Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I think it will be better for me to share my pom's that way you can see all the 
compilation options used.  The pom for the parent (FmClient2), the MainApp and 
one module (Overview) have been attached to this email.


On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:22 PM Harbs 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Roman, can you share your full compiler options?

I decided to remove the below settings completely
-export-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false


I enabled the below settings

-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;
-js-default-initializers=true


The release version starts up

Hiedra, that’s great!


On Dec 30, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Yes. I am testing with the sdk compiled on branch ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:10 PM Maria Jose Esteve 
<mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> wrote:
Roman, are you testing with the SDK compiled from the Harb branches, 
ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO, or from develop?

Hiedra

De: Roman Isitua <romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: jueves, 30 de diciembre de 2021 16:52
Para: users@royale.apache.org<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>
Asunto: Re: Compiling Modules (was Re: Load time is very slow)

I decided to remove the below settings completely
-export-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false


I enabled the below settings

-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;
-js-default-initializers=true


The release version starts up



<image001.png>


<image002.png>

However, the moment I launch a module. I get the below error

<image003.png>


It appears to be failing when I launch the "Overview" module (by clicking the 
Overview side menu).

So my current observation is that by retaining only two settings

-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;
-js-default-initializers=true

The release module starts up but the app fails whenever I launch a module.

The smallest size settings in the documentation do not work. The app does not 
start up.

-export-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false



The error trace is below


Uncaught TypeError: cm.valuesImpl.init is not a function
    at Wr.Rr.pl<http://wr.rr.pl/> (Overview.js:792)
    at Function.mq.generateMXMLProperties (Overview.js:743)
    at Wr.lq.generateMXMLAttributes (Overview.js:551)
    at new Wr (Overview.js:810)
    at QN.J.loadHandler (FrontEnd.js:1978)
3Overview.js:56 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined 
(reading 'prototype')
    at P (Overview.js:56)
    at VG.convert (FrontEnd.js:910)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOver @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOut @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOver @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOut @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOver @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOut @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOver (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOver @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121
FrontEnd.js:1649 Uncaught TypeError: M is not a function
    at sM.J.handleMouseOut (FrontEnd.js:1649)
    at Function.ny [as googFireListener] (FrontEnd.js:123)
    at ny (FrontEnd.js:250)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.iy (FrontEnd.js:125)
    at HTMLAnchorElement.b (FrontEnd.js:121)
J.handleMouseOut @ FrontEnd.js:1649
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:250
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:32 PM Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I get the same error even when I set the 
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:24 PM Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Using the below settings,

-export-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false
-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=false;
-js-default-initializers=true


Debug version runs fine. The release version does not start up

<image004.png>


I get the below errors

Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'apply')
    at KE.hm (FrontEnd.js:1600)
    at XE.M.Fb (FrontEnd.js:943)
    at XE.M.uh (FrontEnd.js:937)
    at FE.M.na<http://fe.m.na/> (FrontEnd.js:497)
    at FE.M.v (FrontEnd.js:497)
    at dR.M.S (FrontEnd.js:213)
    at dR.Nz.S (FrontEnd.js:217)
    at dR.M.start (FrontEnd.js:1396)
    at index.html:45
:8080/favicon.ico:1 Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status 
of 404 (Not Found)


FrontEnd.js is the start up class for the application. i.e. It implements the 
Jewel application class.



On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:19 PM Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Harb,

Thanks for your response. I have gone through the documentation. I will do my 
test again starting with the smallest size option and share my findings.

Regards,

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:59 AM Harbs 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry for my deal in responding.

Let’s take a step back.

I’m not sure how you are compiling your modules. I just added some content to 
the module documentation page which explains what compiler options you need 
while compiling modules. (It still needs some editing.) 
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/modules#minification

Are you using those options?

On Dec 29, 2021, at 2:19 AM, Maria Jose Esteve 
<mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> wrote:

Hi, Let me join you with these tests....

@Harb, I have compiled the SDK from this branch, feature/ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO, 
 and when running in debug I get this error:

Message on the PURGE CONSOLE is displayed:

Cannot convert  org.apache.royale.reflection.beads.ClassAliasBead  to IBead

Message in the IDE Window:

Se produjo una excepción: TypeError: Cannot convert [object Object] to IBead
  at App.org.apache.royale.core.ElementWrapper.addBead 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/core/ElementWrapper.js:114:11)
    at App.org.apache.royale.core.HTMLElementWrapper.addBead 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/core/HTMLElementWrapper.js:43:65)
    at App.org.apache.royale.jewel.Application.start 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/jewel/Application.js:246:10)
    at App.App_loadXML (http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/App.js:1681:25)
    at 
org.apache.royale.net.URLLoader.org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher.fireListeners
 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.js:97:23)
    at Function.goog.events.EventTarget.dispatchEventInternal_ 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/library/closure/goog/events/eventtarget.js:381:26)
    at 
org.apache.royale.net.URLLoader.org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher.dispatchEvent
 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.js:72:37)
    at org.apache.royale.net.URLLoader.jsEventHandler 
(http://localhost:8080/WNetSuitePlus/org/apache/royale/net/URLLoader.js:169:12)

Call stack:

<image003.png>

[INFO] Executing MXMLC in tool group Royale with args: [
-load-config=D:\Develop_Royale\Projects\WinPlusWebSuite\royaleapp\royalelogin\target\compile-app-config.xml,
-js-default-initializers=true,
-source-map=true,
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true,
-keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,Event,PostConstruct,PreDestroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient,
-keep-code-with-metadata=Inject,
-show-binding-warnings=false,
-export-public-symbols=false,
-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false,
-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false,
-js-output=D:\Develop_Royale\Projects\WinPlusWebSuite\royaleapp\royalelogin\target\javascript,
-compiler.targets=JSRoyale,
D:\Develop_Royale\Projects\WinPlusWebSuite\royaleapp\royalelogin\src\main\royale\App.mxml


The release execution does not change, the error is the same as before (SDK 
compilation from the develop branch):

Se produjo una excepción: ReferenceError: Error #1065: Variable 
com.iest.winplusweb.models.MasterConfigSystemModel is not defined.
  at yR (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:3605:1771)
    at Mya (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:3343:365)
    at AR.J.usa (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:434:441)
    at GFa.J.fromTypeDefinition 
(http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:5706:139)
    at Function.YT.getTypeDescriptor 
(http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:4570:820)
    at Function.fX.constructBean 
(http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:2336:472)
    at r$.J.initialize (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:5041:66)
    at OW.J.init (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:950:452)
    at OW.J.u (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:951:454)
    at $$.J.addBead (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:357:549)

The main difference:
project compiled from "SDK-develop" runs fine in js-debug and gives error in 
js-release and, compiled from "SDK-ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO" does not launch 
because of conversion error.

Hiedra

De: Roman Isitua <romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: martes, 28 de diciembre de 2021 15:55
Para: users@royale.apache.org<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>
Asunto: Re: Load time is very slow

@Harb

I have checked out the feature/ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO branch and compiled asjs 
and compiler. I have rebuilt my application with modules in release mode.

I get the following error when I attempt to launch a module


<image001.png>


The module loads fine in debug mode

<image002.png>


Snippets of the log

Overview.js:786 Uncaught TypeError: cm.valuesImpl.init is not a function
    at Rr.Mr.yl (Overview.js:786)
    at Function.iq.generateMXMLProperties (Overview.js:736)
    at Rr.hq.generateMXMLAttributes (Overview.js:546)
    at new Rr (Overview.js:804)
    at LN.J.loadHandler (FrontEnd.js:1967)
Mr.yl @ Overview.js:786
iq.generateMXMLProperties @ Overview.js:736
hq.generateMXMLAttributes @ Overview.js:546
Rr @ Overview.js:804
J.loadHandler @ FrontEnd.js:1967
load (async)
LN.loadModule @ FrontEnd.js:1965
dN.loadModule @ FrontEnd.js:2406
LD.Un @ FrontEnd.js:1809
ny @ FrontEnd.js:123
ny @ FrontEnd.js:248
iy @ FrontEnd.js:125
b @ FrontEnd.js:121


I have attached the full log to this email.




On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 2:51 PM Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Maria,

Prior to starting this mail discussion "Load time is very slow". I can confirm 
I have only been compiling in debug mode. My target\javascript\bin\ only had 
js-debug. It was after I upgraded my royale sdk from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8 that I 
compiled in release mode.



On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 2:24 PM Maria Jose Esteve 
<mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> wrote:
Hi, @Roman, I think you are doing a double compile can it be? My times are the 
same as yours and I always compile in debug and release.

Look at your target folder " target\javascript\bin\" and if you have two 
folders: js-debug and js-release you are compiling always double.

In my case, the architecture of my project as well as the Maven compilation 
files (pom.xml) were provided by an external company (we didn't know anything 
about Maven or Royale at that time) and I understand that this formula was 
chosen to show us the options we had.

A priori and without doing any test as Harb has done, I think that modularity 
gives us the advantage of compiling parts of the code once and not compiling 
them again if they are not modified. So far WITH MY COMPILATION TIMES, 
sometimes more than 1 minute, this is fundamental. But of course, now we have 
the problem of minification of the modules and it is really a serious problem 
because it is impossible for us to deploy in production.

I will try to separate the compiación realese with a profile and if I succeed I 
will pass it to you @Roman.

@Harb what do you mean by compiling the ROYALE_INTERFACE_INFO branch?

Hiedra

De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: lunes, 27 de diciembre de 2021 18:32
Para: users@royale.apache.org<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>
Asunto: Re: Load time is very slow

That doesn’t sound right.

Are you sure you’re compiling debug and not release? That sounds like release 
build times.

On Dec 27, 2021, at 3:31 PM, Roman Isitua 
<romanisi...@gmail.com<mailto:romanisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 Wow ! You are using a workstation with a bleeding edge processor.

 I just compiled my app now. It took 44 seconds. (First compilation after ide 
start up.) Subsequently compilations are usually 19s to 20s.

 My application code base is very very small compared to yours.  As we continue 
to add functionality, I expect the compile times to rise.




<MainApp_pom.xml><Overview_pom.xml><fm_client2_pom.xml>


Reply via email to