On 14/11/2017 13:29, Jacob Saina wrote: >>> 2) I've noticed that the "rsb-report-arm-rtems4.11-kernel...." file >>> (attached) >>> says "RSB: not a valid repo." What does this mean? >> >> I suggest you try a build with `--without-rtems` on the command line. ... > > I've kicked off a build --without-rtems. But is this related to the "RSB: not > a > valid repo" message?
I suspect this is a bug where the code is attempting to update or look the package as a repo but is not. I am still yet to test this. > >>> 3) My build seems to take an excessively long time given my hardware -- it >>> fails >>> in ~5.5 hours with a brand new laptop with i7, 16GB RAM, and SSDs. My >>> coworker >>> had no problems on an older laptop with v4.11.0, and that completed in 3:40. >> >>What was the architecture? Different architectures have a differing number of >>libraries and this changes the time needed to build. > > Same architecture, ARM, and same command line except for "4.11.2" vs "4.11.0." > We've gotten that computer to build applications and run them on the Xilinx > zcu706. > I wonder if the default of building RTEMS changed for releases and this is why. > >>Also the RTEMS kernel building builds all BSPs and this arch has a lot of >>BSPs. >>That would take a while. > > Oh, I didn't realize that! Looking at the quick start guide > (https://docs.rtems.org/releases/rtems-docs-4.11.2/user/start/index.html), if > the sb-set-builder step has already built the kernel and BSPs, what does the > kernel building step do? Thank you for the feedback and yes you are right this could be better. Chris _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
