That sounds like the 'switch' I was looking for....I will give it a try, thanks! I'll post the results.
gnodet wrote: > > Have you tried to rebuild the Ode SE with a self-first classloader instead > of a parent-first classloader ? > This can be done in the META-INF/jbi.xml descriptor. > > On Nov 29, 2007 9:55 AM, Jan Arend Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to use a BPEL engine in combination with CXF components on >> ServiceMix 3.2. ODE seems to be ServiceMix's BPEL engine of choice, but >> ODE-jbi-1.1 does not install on SM 3.2 due to a version conflict in the >> geronimo libraries discussed earlier in this mailing list. >> >> Architecturally I think a SE should have a scoped classloader that >> prioritizes local SE libraries over the servicemix libraries. Otherwise >> you >> will never be able to intergrate a non-servicemix maintained SE, beause >> of >> potentential library conflicts. You can't really expect ODE to comply to >> the >> versions of libraries that ServiceMix uses, can you? Is there a mechanism >> in >> SM to force this? >> >> I've tried to use the suggested workaround by creating a datasource on >> ServiceMix level that ODE SE can use (as suggested by Alex in another >> thread). That works, but the problem I run into is that this database >> does >> not have the ODE schema auto-generated, so installation still fails.... >> >> Any suggestions how I could use a (not necessarilly ODE) BPEL engine in >> combination with CXF with ServiceMix? >> >> Thanks, >> Jan Arend >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Servicemix-3.2-and-ODE-1.1-install-error-tf4895765s12049.html#a14021370 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Servicemix-3.2-and-ODE-1.1-install-error-tf4895765s12049.html#a14022541 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
