You're right. The best way to access ServiceMix from another technology is to go through ActiveMQ. As to whether you need a separate ActiveMQ instance or not, I don't see the need to do so. Though you may want to have more than one ActiveMQ broker to achieve load balancing and fail over, but this is a distinct problem.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Nascent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been reading up on ServiceMix, trying to find the best way to use C++ > to develop consumers or producers. I realize there are quite a few > mechanisms to accomplish this task. So I am wondering if anyone has much > experience with this and can recommend the best approach. > > I was also wondering if the ActiveMQ instance that ServiceMix uses for its > backend can be directly accessed via ActiveMQ-CPP and still retain the full > features of the ESB. This seems like the most direct/efficient approach if > it works this way. Otherwise, I was thinking about using a separate instance > of ActiveMQ and plugging it into ServiceMix via servicemix-jms. > > Any advice would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks! > Jacob > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Service-Mix-and-C%2B%2B---best-practices-tp15949904s12049p15949904.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
