Bruce, sorry to be such a pain! However, I still don't fully understand when
JMS is used for communication between JBI components. If I've understood
correctly:
* JMS is only used in the JMS and JCA flows (to cluster together
ServiceMix instances)
* JMS is *NOT* used in the other two flows (Straight-through and SEDA),
and these flows
When is the embedded ActiveMQ used, other than in the JMS and JCA flows?
Thanks again!!
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:59 PM, raulvk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it does clarify some questions. I actually wasn't aware that
>> ServiceMix
>> runs along with an embedded ApacheMQ broker inside its JVM.
>>
>> I am interested in learning more about how this works. Does this mean
>> that
>> straight-through flow and SEDA flow operate on top of JMS? Can you
>> provide
>> some references on how exactly this relationship works?
>
> The SEDA flow does not use JMS queuing, it uses a specialized SEDA
> queue. The JMS and JCA flows do use JMS queuing.
>
>> As to the pattern that I am looking to implement, using the JMS BC means
>> deserialising from and serialising between the JMS and NMR formats,
>> right?
>
> No, there is no serialization step because the messages are already in
> an XML format.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix---EDA-tp16291801s12049p16318965.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
