What if I make the processorName to "standard" ? Does it same as using <jms:consumer/> with concurrentConsumers setting to 1 ?
gnodet wrote: > > Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/> > endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be > sent > into the NMR at the same time. > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to >> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ? >> >> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of >> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish first >> than the previous one. >> >> How I force that in the smx ? >> >> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several >> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the >> synchronous >> message exchange processing... Is that right ? >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16608365.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
