The second one would better reflect the reality. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM, pratibhaG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I am using serviceMix 3.2.1 > I am using service-eip static-routing-slip to route my message to three > services test:MyS1PojoService, MyS2PojoService and MyS3PojoService. > I have a configuration like this: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <beans xmlns:eip="http://servicemix.apache.org/eip/1.0"; > xmlns:test="http://test";> > <eip:static-routing-slip service="test:MyStaticRoutingSlipService" > endpoint="myStaticRoutingSlipSu"> > <eip:targets> > <eip:exchange-target service="test:MyS1PojoService" endpoint="myS1PojoSu"/> > <eip:exchange-target service="test:MyS2PojoService" endpoint="myS2PojoSu" > operation="test:processThis"/> > <eip:exchange-target service="test:MyS3PojoService" endpoint="myS3PojoSu"/> > </eip:targets> > </eip:static-routing-slip> > </beans> > > In this case how the communication happens? > Does it happen like this: > > 1)MyStaticRoutingSlipService->MyS1PojoService->MyS2PojoService->MyS3PojoService->MyStaticRoutingSlipService > > or like this: > > 1)MyStaticRoutingSlipService->MyS1PojoService->MyStaticRoutingSlipService->MyS2PojoService->MyStaticRoutingSlipService->MyS3PojoService->MyStaticRoutingSlipService > > which one of the above communication is right? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/in-servicemix-eip-static-routing-slip-how-the-message-flow--tp16847788p16847788.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
