On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:38 PM, jsexton0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi -
> Correct me if this is not the case, but a group chat appears to use a "room"
> attribute rather than a "participant".
Yes, that's correct if you're using the GroupChatEndpoint. I based my
response on the configuration you posted a few days ago where you were
using the PrivateChatEndpoint.
> I've just started looking at the
> source code and one thing I see is that the Servicemix class uses a
> GroupChat created by a call to createGroupChat() rather than a MultiUserChat
> instance. The Ignite folks seem to be recommending the MultiUserChat class
> over GroupChat, and that also happens to be what I used in my application
> with Openfire already.
>
> I probably need to create a GroupChatEndpoint with the slightly different
> smack usage (MultiUserChat).
I'm not sure about that, my familiarity with XMPP is minimal.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
