Ivan,
Regardless of sync/async, the InOut MEP will always be handled as
outlined in the 'invocation example' paragraph on
http://servicemix.apache.org/5-jbi.html.
The only difference is that if you use sendSync on the consumer
component side, the method call will not return before the entire
invocation is finished. Right after the method call, you have the full
response message available. However, this also means that the component
thread, while waiting for the reponse, is unable to do anything else.
If you use a plain send(), the method call will return immediately and
processing continues in the background. The consumer component thread
is available to do other work. However, we still need to be able to
find out about the reponse message. Therefore, the consumer component
will most likely implement the ExchangeProcessor interface, which has a
process(MessageExchange) method that will be invoked on step4/5 to
signal the availability of the reponse message. It's the consumer
reponsibility to send the DONE message to finish the Exchange.
Regards,
Gert
ivan wrote:
Lars Heinemann пишет:
Ivan,
the MEP is not important as far as I know.
The only difference is the sending method.
send() will send the message async
sendSync() as the name says sends sync
What about if we have send() and MEP InOut? What is behaviour or 2
services?
Thanks,
Ivan Pryvalov.
Lars
Am Donnerstag 07 August 2008 15:49:28 schrieb ivan:
Hi!
How can I send asynchronously NornilizedMessages in JBI-env of
ServiceMix?
Should I use InOnly MEP as well as io.send() instead of io.sendSync()?
Thanks,
Ivan Pryvalov.
