When the smx-eip AbstractAggregator times out, do you agree that the created exchange should propagate the correlationId of its original Splitter/StaticRecipientList consumer? Currently, this does not appear to occur because the timer runs in a different thread which seems to prevent the natural passing of the exchange correlationId property. Should I open a JIRA for this issue?
- Ron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/smx-eip-AbstractAggregator-timeout-exchange-bad-correlationId-tp19287177p19287177.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
