Ok, I misunderstood because there is an interface which is called
ExchangeListener which has a completely different purpose.
Actually, it may be of some interest for you.
This interface is called
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.event.ExchangeListener and can be used to
intercept exchanges synchronously.
If you register such a listener on the JBI container, it will be given
all the exchanges sent or received synchronously.
For some examples on how to use those, you can check the following code:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx3/trunk/core/servicemix-audit/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/audit/AbstractAuditor.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx3/trunk/core/servicemix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/view/DotViewFlowListener.java
You can register those using
<smx:container ...>
<smx:listeners>
.. put your listener here ...
</smx:listeners>
</smx:container>
Alternatively, you can extend the BaseSystemService to participate in
the container lifecycle and register it using
<smx:container ...>
<smx:services>
.. put your listener here ...
</smx:services>
</smx:container>
If you simply need a reference to the JBI container, your listener can
implement the ContainerAware interface.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Jussi Nummelin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://servicemix.apache.org/maven/servicemix-core/apidocs/org/apache/servicemix/MessageExchangeListener.html
>
> "If a Component implements this interface, MessageExchange will be
> delivered directly to the listener asynchronously rather than using
> the usual asynchronous delivery with a thread used up per consuming
> component."
>
> Basically what I'm looking for is kind of a synchronous Wiretap
> pattern without modifying the sender or EIP pattern in use. What I
> want to achieve is an intercepting model to plug in different aspects
> in AOP style.
>
> BR,
> - Jussi -
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, the listeners are invoked synchronously.
>> Where did you found this misleading documentation, it should be fixed ?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Jussi Nummelin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Looking at the documentation it seems that the ExchangeListener works
>>> in async mode (respect to the original message exchange), is that
>>> correct?
>>>
>>> Is there any way to configure it to work in synchronous way, i.e. the
>>> MEX would be delivered only after the listener is finished processing?
>>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> - Jussi -
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://open.iona.com
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
