I am using smx 3.2.x and need to configure JMS consumers and providers to work with a non-ActiveMQ broker that does not provide a Pooled or Caching JMS ConnectionFactory.
Is the technique described on the following wiki page recommended for such a use case: http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=OpenMQSpringJTOM? Of course, I would use the Geronimo Transaction Manager supplied with smx instead of JOTM as described in this article. Specifically, I am looking for feedback regarding the combined use of the Spring JMS SingleConnectionFactory, the Jencks PooledSpringXAConnectionFactory, and the Geronimo Transaction Manager? When I upgrade to smx 3.3, would using the Spring JMS CachingConnectionFactory be recommended over the SingleConnectionFactory/Jencks combination? Your feedback is appreciated. /Ron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Configuring-smx-3.2.x-to-interact-with-non-ActiveMQ-brokers-tp20395113p20395113.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
