Well, if i want to invoke the deployment localy, what should i do in order
to get the Spring context of this bean & invoke it?

Is it a good approach?

Thanks.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:

> The DeployServiceAssembly is supposed to be initialized via a spring config
> from inside servicemix (it's really only used when using a static
> configuration file for servicemix to be able to deploy jbi artifacts from
> the configuration itself).
> I thought you were looking for a remote way to deploy your SA.
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 16:41, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > After a bit research i got my hands on the class which implement the
> deploy
> > process itself & wrote the following:
> >
> > DeployServiceAssembly deploySA = *new* DeployServiceAssembly();
> >
> > deploySA.setServiceAssemblyName(
> > "c:\liav\forecast-weather-consumer-sa-1.1.jar");
> >
> > deploySA.doDeploy(); // <- compilation error here
> > But, I have the following compilation error indicating a build bath error
> > on
> > Spring.
> >
> > The type org.springframework.beans.factory.InitializingBean cannot be
> > resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files
> >
> > My build path points to the .m2 repository - why is it refering to Spring
> > class?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > See http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jmx/remote/custom.html and
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/nmr/trunk/jbi/deployer/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/deployer/task/JbiTask.java
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 06:54, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Guillaume,
> > > >
> > > > I do follow your code but i get an exception:
> > > >
> > > > Exception in thread "main" *java.lang.IllegalArgumentException*:
> > > > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.framework.AdminCommandsService is not  n
> > > > interface
> > > > at java.lang.reflect.Proxy.getProxyClass(*Proxy.java:362*) at
> > > > java.lang.reflect.Proxy.newProxyInstance(*Proxy.java:581*) at
> > > > javax.management.MBeanServerInvocationHandler.newProxyInstance(*
> > > > MBeanServerInvocationHandler.java:149*)at
> > > >
> com.amdocs.oxp.sdp.ManageSMXMbean.getSmxMBean(*ManageSMXMbean.java:48*)
> > > at
> > > > com.amdocs.oxp.sdp.ManageSMXMbean.main(*ManageSMXMbean.java:60*)
> > > >
> > > > It's because i didn't implemented the
> > > > JmxConnector::getMBeanServerConnection() - it's currently returning
> > null.
> > > >
> > > > Can you advise on its implementation?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You should really look at the code of the ant tasks i mentionned
> > above.
> > > > > You'll see how to create everything, create a proxy to the
> > > > > AdminCommandsService and perform operations using it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:10, liav ezer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can you advise on the implementation of
> > > > > > JmxConnector::getMBeanServerConnection()
> > > > > > method?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do i need to downloaad any jars to work with the JMS api?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, if you want to *deploy* a SA, you will not have anything
> > > > related
> > > > > > > to that in JMX before deploying it.
> > > > > > > The objectName is the one I pasted earlier, which is the JMX
> name
> > > > > > > under which the AdminCommandsService object is registered.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 17:30, liav ezer <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > a bit confused about the second parameter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > objectName is the name of the MBean i want to manipulate?
> > Meaning
> > > > is
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > name of the SA?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I would advise using something similar to what the ant tasks
> > do:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>        return (AdminCommandsService)
> > > > > > > >> MBeanServerInvocationHandler.newProxyInstance(
> > > > > > > >>                jmxConnector.getMBeanServerConnection(),
> > > > objectName,
> > > > > > > >>                AdminCommandsService.class, true);
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This should work with Java >= 1.4
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 16:50, liav ezer <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > Can i use JMX api in java 1.5?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > According to this sun document the api is available for
> 1.6,
> > > > > > correct?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/management/index.html
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Yes, ant tasks use the JMX api and the jbi maven plugin
> > uses
> > > > ant
> > > > > > > >> >> tasks, so if you want to manage jbi artifacts
> > > programmatically,
> > > > > > using
> > > > > > > >> >> JMX is the way to go.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 15:57, liav ezer <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > Please correct me if i'm wrong but the second option
> (JMX
> > > > api)
> > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > >> like
> > > > > > > >> >> a
> > > > > > > >> >> > more supported API then start running ant commands.
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Let me explain:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > If i only wish to deploy the SA then running JBI:Deploy
> > > will
> > > > > > simply
> > > > > > > >> >> > accomplish it. But, if i also want to retrieve the
> > returned
> > > > > > status
> > > > > > > >> from
> > > > > > > >> >> the
> > > > > > > >> >> > deploy action then i'll have a tough time using ant
> > command
> > > > > while
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> JMX
> > > > > > > >> >> > api will probably support it.
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Am i shooting to the right direction here?
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> No, you can either use ant tasks, or use plain JMX api
> > to
> > > > > access
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> >> >> AdminCommandsService object which is already available
> > in
> > > > JMX.
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 15:19, liav ezer <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >> > So, i should implement this interface & in
> > > > > > deployServiceAssembly
> > > > > > > >> >> method i
> > > > > > > >> >> >> > use ant tasks?
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> You can use ant tasks or JMX (ant tasks use JMX
> > > > > underneath).
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> At the end, everything is delegated to
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.framework.AdminCommandsServiceMBean
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> object registered in JMX.
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> See
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx3/trunk/core/servicemix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/framework/AdminCommandsServiceMBean.java
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> It's jmx name is by default:
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.servicemix:ContainerName=ServiceMix,Type=SystemService,Name=AdminCommandsService
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> You should find it easily in JConsole or any other
> > JMX
> > > > > > console.
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:59, Liav Ezer <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Hi,
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > I'm intrested in automating the deploy phase of
> my
> > > SA.
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Assuming that i have built a SA & it's ready to
> be
> > > > > deployed
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> servicemix,
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > which Java API do i use in order to deploy it &
> get
> > > the
> > > > > > deply
> > > > > > > >> >> process
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> status
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > from the container?
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > --
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > View this message in context:
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Java-API-to-deploy-SA--tp22288609p22288609.html
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list
> > archive
> > > at
> > > > > > > >> Nabble.com.
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >> >>  Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > >> >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > >> >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> > > > > > > >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> > > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>  Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > >> >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> Open Source SOA
> > > > > > > >> >> http://fusesource.com
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>  Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > >> ------------------------
> > > > > > > >> Open Source SOA
> > > > > > > >> http://fusesource.com
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >  Cheers,
> > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > > > Open Source SOA
> > > > > > > http://fusesource.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >  Cheers,
> > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > Open Source SOA
> > > > > http://fusesource.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > ------------------------
> > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > ------------------------
> > > Open Source SOA
> > > http://fusesource.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Reply via email to