Hi, I have a question about the SMX4 NMR. I had a look to the source code and it seems that the SMX4 NMR relies on 2 main parts which are: - A "non-jbi" NMR (org.apache.servicemix.nmr.api + org.apache.servicemix.nmr.core):these 2 modules provide most of the features of a JBI NMR but don't rely on JBI interfaces at all. - A "JBI wrapper" on top of the "non-JBI" NMR (most notably org.apache.servicemix.jbi.runtime): this module implements the JBI interfaces and implementation is sort of a wrapper of the "non-JBI" NMR.
I'm really interested into the non JBI NMR because it's really lightweight and seems to offer most of the feature you can expect from the JBI NMR without sticking to the standard (it may sounds weird for most of you guys, but it's a strength in my context). My main concern is that I don't know if this non JBI is intended to be used as is. It seems to be the case since it's well separated from the other one and offer clear interfaces and stuff. It's even possible to create samples that uses this non JBI NMR and they works fine. However, despites it's possible to do it technically, I don't know if this kind of usage is encouraged or not ? Could you please tell me if it's possible to use it as is and if there are any potential drawbacks by doing so ? Thanks, BQ. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4-NMR---Usage-tp22725677p22725677.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
