GNodet, does this engine support persistent subscriptions? If not, we would like to develop it with the community.
gnodet wrote: > > I think it mainly depends on how you use ws-notifications. > If your subscribers are JBI components, they will always > be reachable (unless you manually stop the SU in which > they are defined), so it should be safe. > If your subscribers are external services (http for example), > you may want to use PullPoints which should give > you some persistence. > A JIRA already exists for using durable subscriptions > (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-417). > Feel free to vote for it and/or provide a patch ... > > On 9/18/06, pradeep <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> http://www.servicemix.org/sm30ug/servicemix-wsn2005.html >> >> Subscriptions not being persistent is a serious limitation. When will >> this >> be fixed ? I think ws-notifications are not safe to be used for >> production? >> Can other users please share their experiences. Thanks. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/ws-notification-limitations-tf2290726.html#a6362005 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ws-notification-limitations-tp6362005p23175836.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
