On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jeroen Verhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > In evaluating ServiceMix I found that a lot of the functionality > offered by the different components of SM are also available in Camel > (file, ftp, transformation, eip, jms etc.). So if you already need > Camel in your SM project, for example for advanced message routing, > what would be the advantage of using the SM 'native' components > instead of solving all problems in Camel? >
There are some FAQ entries here about the difference http://camel.apache.org/faq > -- > > regards, > > Jeroen > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
