What a problem. Adding the parallelProcessing attribute to split didn't make a difference. Bellow I show the time it took to send 10.000 registers to the queue in both cases:
10.000 registers without parallel: 13:54:50.787 14:04:35.646 10.000 registers with parallel: 15:00:28.563 15:10:22.766 Any other ideas? Could it be performance issue on JMS side? Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Performance-issues-to-load-csv-file-tp5486044p5486726.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
