Hi Guillaume,
you are right, we are going to take a look on that.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2012 02:42 PM, PAC Kieffer Guillaume wrote:
Hi Jean Baptiste,
Thanks for your clear advice.
I am slowly getting the differences between v3 and v4 versions.
Just one point regarding the web site, as a new user:
It would be good to have a clear distinction between v3 and v4 related pages:
For instance http://servicemix.apache.org/tutorials.html links to v3 tutorials
(same as http://servicemix.apache.org/old/tutorials.html)
Some links may be corrupted this way.. it's hard to make the difference as the
layout is identical.
Updating the old web site to a red background would help new users ;)
Thanks again and Regards,
Guillaume.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ServiceMix XML transformations
Hi Guillaume,
JBI is more or less deprecated.
I highly advice to use the camel component.
More over, you don't have to use the NMR to normalize the message, etc.
You can do all in simple Camel routes.
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2012 11:49 AM, PAC Kieffer Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
I am building a PoC ServiceMix (4) and Camel, trying to put in place an
integration scenario with XML Transformations.
I am trying to figure out what would be the best solution for XML
transformations (XSLT):
Should I create my own JBI SUs based on servicemix-saxon or simply use Camel
xslt component ?
Any best practice ? Pros/Cons ?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Guillaume.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
