yeah, you can, especially for advanced users, as SMX4 is based on Karaf.
But SMX4 support camel/cxf/activemq out-of-box, with means fine-tuned
jre.properties/custom.properties, endorsed libs, camel related
examples , and the default shipped camel features.xml which bundle
version match with the underlying karaf.
Freeman
On 2012-6-20, at 上午10:20, James Carman wrote:
Some might argue that you really don't need SMX at all. Just use
Karaf and add in what you want.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Freeman Fang
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Yes in SMX4 you should use camel directly(SMX4 just play a role as
an OSGi
container) to substitute the legacy JBI BC/SE.
Freeman
On 2012-6-20, at 上午8:26, indpnc26 wrote:
As for CAMEL and ServiceMix, it is said that CAMEL is just one of
the
components which ServiceMix uses and using CAMEL is the best
option for
service orchestration.
But, from my experiences, i could possibly minimize ServiceMix's
role as
just a container for CAMEL and replace ServiceMix BC/SE with CAMEL.
Is Using ServiceMix and CAMEL like said above desirable and
advisable?
thank you in advance.
with kind regards
--
View this message in context:
http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Can-CAMEL-be-substitute-for-ServiceMix-BC-SE-tp5713751.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:[email protected]
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:[email protected]
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
