Hi, As you don't care about the return value, then add a oneway method in cxf-se is the right way to go.
Freeman －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042 On 2012-12-4, at 下午11:54, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote: > Hi, > I'm using the QuartzEndpoint to invoke a SU (cxf-se) that returns a value > (with servicemix 3.4.0). > > The QuartzEndpoint always create an InOnly exchange and I keep getting this > exception > > javax.jbi.messaging.MessagingException: Out not supported > at > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.MessageExchangeImpl.setMessage(MessageExchangeImpl.java:361) > at > org.apache.cxf.transport.jbi.JBIDestinationOutputStream.commitOutputMessage(JBIDestinationOutputStream.java:131) > at > org.apache.cxf.transport.jbi.JBIDestinationOutputStream.doClose(JBIDestinationOutputStream.java:70) > at > org.apache.cxf.io.CachedOutputStream.close(CachedOutputStream.java:191) > at > org.apache.cxf.transport.AbstractConduit.close(AbstractConduit.java:56) > at > org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor.handleMessage(MessageSenderInterceptor.java:62) > at > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:263) > at > org.apache.cxf.interceptor.OutgoingChainInterceptor.handleMessage(OutgoingChainInterceptor.java:77) > at > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:263) > at > org.apache.cxf.transport.ChainInitiationObserver.onMessage(ChainInitiationObserver.java:121) > at > org.apache.cxf.transport.jbi.JBIDispatcherUtil.dispatch(JBIDispatcherUtil.java:156) > at > org.apache.servicemix.cxfse.CxfSeEndpoint.process(CxfSeEndpoint.java:474) > > > Everything works fine but it's quite annoying to have all those "false" > exceptions in the log. Is there any simple way to avoid this exception? > > I think adding an intermediate component could be an option or subclassing > the QuartzEndpoint to change the exchange creation or adding another void > method on the cxf SU, but all of these look like hacks. > > I'm not interested in the return value so it's ok for it to be lost. > > > Thanks, bye > > > Lorenzo
