Hi, Did you rename the file or is it still called x.stub?
Regards, Achim sent from mobile device Am 30.05.2014 15:53 schrieb "harald" <[email protected]>: > Hello list, > I'm a little bit confused. To prepare a demo I installed SMX 5.0.1 into two > separate folders on the same machine. SMX-A should use port range 10xxx and > SMX-B should use 20xxx. To prepare the SMX-A instance I edited some files > within the etc folder. To define a different Jetty port I modified > org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub and system.properties. Than I started the > SMX-A instance for the first time to let SMX create the activemq.xml and > the > jetty.xml. Updated these files as well and started SMX-A again. > > Within the logs I see: > 14:06:09,726 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl > | > 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at > [0.0.0.0]:[10080] > 14:06:09,729 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl > | > 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at > [0.0.0.0]:[8181] > > Is there any easy explanation why jetty is still listening on port 8181?? > And maybe .. is there an easy way of redefining the port completely? > > For curiosity I prepared SMX-B as well and used the proper port range. It's > only complaining about the jetty setup with the expected message: Caused > by: > java.net.BindException: Address already in use > > Thanks for any hint! > harald > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
