Hey, Have a look at https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html. Particularly question #2. It should solve most of your doubts.
Regards, *Raúl Kripalani* Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:46 AM, johndoe <[email protected]> wrote: > Morning all, > > We are a small private organisation looking to use Apache ServiceMix > internally, and our legal team has asked me to establish if Apache > ServiceMix is really "free" and that it doesn't require any attribution in > our use case. > > We will not be redistributing ServiceMix and just using it internally > (although we will be sending data to third-parties that has been processed > by ServiceMix). > > We've been bitten by "open-source" software licenses in the past, so our > legal guy is a little concerned and would like some sort of confirmation > from the Apache Software Foundation. It's probably his job to interpret > the > Apache 2.0 License and decide this for us, however he's asking me to do > some > digging and see if I can find this out. > > I know it will be difficult to obtain an official confirmation from Apache, > so does anyone know how I can confirm without any doubt that we're able to > use SM without any charges and without the requirement to attribute? I know > the license pretty much spells out quite plainly that it is free, so it is > more about the attribution requirements. > > Thankyou in advance, > John > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Apache-2-0-license-tp5722936.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
