Yes, but it has to be mentioned in the NOTICE, which is not the case.
Regards
JB
On 04/29/2016 10:56 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
it is dual licensed under CDDL + GPL, so taking it for CDDL and including
it in binary form in an apache software is okay according to this document
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
2016-04-28 1:19 GMT+02:00 docentmail <[email protected]>:
I found that stax-ex-1.7.6.jar that is part of 3.5.1 ServiceMix
distribution
is under CDDL+GPL license. From other side the ServiceMix as whole is
under Apache 2 license. Question is: can I distribute ServiseMix 3.5.1 to
my
customer as Apache 2 software, or I should consider it as GPL because of
stax-ex-1.7.6.jar license?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/License-of-Extended-StAX-API-jar-tp5723637.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
