Hi Jörg,

The preparation is a bit longer than expected mostly to avoid just a move.

The spec bundles are already in preparation (using Karaf features, which will 
be easier for user).

The TP SMX bundles preparation not yet start (I plan a new feature in Pax URL 
to create a bundle using a descriptor on the fly).

Reasonably, the move won’t be effective before the end of this year.

I will keep you posted on the mailing list.

Regards
JB

> Le 18 sept. 2020 à 19:00, Jörg Jansen <joerg.jan...@inform-software.com> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi everybody, 
> 
> is there already a schedule, when the move of the specs/bundles should be 
> done?
> 
> Best regards,
> Jörg
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
> Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2020 09:55
> To: users@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It has been discussed some weeks ago on the dev mailing list.
> 
> Parts of ServiceMix (bundles, specs) will move to Karaf and the ServiceMix 
> distribution will move to attic.
> 
> ServiceMix distribution is outdated and moving directly to Karaf and Camel 
> will allow users to use updated versions.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:46, Francois Liot <franc...@liot.org> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>> 
>> You do encourage to use Camel in Karaf directly, being one of the most 
>> important comiter and part of the Apache Foundation, does it mean you 
>> are announcing the official end-of-life of ServiceMix ?
>> Let us know,
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Francois
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> How do you set the route ID ?
>>> 
>>> By the way, I strongly encourage you to use Camel with Karaf directly 
>>> (with updated version) instead of ServiceMix.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Sneharghya Pathak <sppatha...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> Hello ServiceMix users,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I am using ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel 2.16.5. The Camel routes have 
>>>> been written using Blueprint XML.
>>>> 
>>>> I have seen a strange behaviour where on deploying the Camel routes, 
>>>> ServiceMix is displaying the bundles as active, but the routes are 
>>>> not installed. I need to redeploy multiple times to get the routes running.
>>>> 
>>>> The second issue is that, once the routes are running, ServiceMix 
>>>> shows
>>> all
>>>> routes in a context as having the same route-id.
>>>> 
>>>> Context                     Route                     Status
>>>>   Total #       Failed #     Inflight #   Uptime
>>>> -------                     -----                     ------
>>>>   -------       --------     ----------   ------
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> star                       star-flattoxml             Started
>>>>    10225              0              0   1 day 19 hours
>>>> 
>>>> Here I know for a fact that all routes in the star context have 
>>>> separate route ids set in the blueprint xml.
>>>> 
>>>> What might be causing this behavior and how should I fix this?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Sneharghya
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to