Ryan, I think you are right. I had made the assumption that there were some social implementation classes in the server jar but it appears they are all in the social api jar (had though it was just the API, not implementation). I'll play with it some more and see what I can put together.
Thanks, Chris On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Ryan Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > To tell you the trust Chris, I have never tried it. I would assume > that there would not be dependencies on the social services in the > core part of Shindig and you could safely exclude the social jars as > long as you remove the Guice modules from your web.xml. > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Chris Geer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is there a way to package Shindig so that I can deploy the gadget > rendering > > parts without having to deploy all the social services? I want to be able > > to deploy a light-weight gadget rendering layer and be able to host the > > social piece separately. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris >
