On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 09:38 +0000 schrieb Markus Joschko: >> >> Obviously nobody has used esps in production until now? That should be >> >> mentioned on the webpage clearly. So far I had the impression that esp >> >> are somewhat the preferred template language. >> > >> > Well, depends ;-) I would say everyone has his/her own preference, Sling >> > does not have a preference ;-) >> >> Preference in the term of: That's the language that is used most >> often, for which patches are are released earlier etc. >> This bug clearly shows that there is a preferred language (which is >> JSP), even if officially there isn't. > > The bug actually shows, that there does not seem such a massive use.
Which is more or less the same. > > But given that we (you and me independently) discovered it yesterday and > I am today fixing it I think this is quite a fast turnaround. Don't you > agree ? ;-) Yep. That's what turns my disappointment about such an easy to to discover yet critical bug into a rather positive feeling. If now the preprocessors are introduced and the post operations are more decoupled/reusable I'll be thrilled ;-) Regards, Markus > >> >> > >> > But in our Day job some if not most of use mostly care for JSP, true. >> > >> >> Do you have a reference to the bug in the felix javascript implementation? >> > >> > I am working on this as we speak. >> >> Any estimate on the fix? I tend to convert our esps to jsps now anyway >> but if there is a quickfix, >> I don't have to do this all at once. Thanks to possibility to have >> different script languages running next to each other. >> >> Regards, >> Markus > > >
