> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Justin Edelson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> Hi, I'm trying to set up a build that will always use the latest
>>>>>> >> >> snapshot of our in-house bundles.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Thus, I'm specifying <version>LATEST</version> in the bundle list 
>>>>>> >> >> XML
>>>>>> >> file:
>>>>>> >> >>        <bundle>
>>>>>> >> >>            <groupId>com.idium.kolibri</groupId>
>>>>>> >> >>            <artifactId>kolibri-loginmodule</artifactId>
>>>>>> >> >>            <version>LATEST</version>
>>>>>> >> >>        </bundle>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> The build fails constantly with "Embedded error: Unable to 
>>>>>> >> >> determine
>>>>>> >> >> the latest version" (see full stacktrace below).
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Is this supposed to work with the Launchpad plugin?
>>>>>> >> >> [...]
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Justin Edelson <
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > The plugin uses the normal Maven artifact resolution subsystem, so 
>>>>>> >> > it
>>>>>> >> should work. We use RELEASE as the http service version.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > I personally don't use LATEST. I have the impression the Maven devs
>>>>>> >> regret supporting it in the first place, but AFAIK, it's still
>>>>>> supported.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks, Justin. The only reason I want to use LATEST in this case, is
>>>>>> >> to have an automated launchpad build with all the latest checkins, for
>>>>>> >> testing purposes. So that I don't have to update the bundle list XML
>>>>>> >> when a bundle is released in a new version.
>>>>>> >> In this case it seems LATEST makes sense - or are there other ways to
>>>>>> >> accomplish what I want?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Justin Edelson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > I wasn't saying you *shouldn't* use LATEST, just providing some 
>>>>>> > context.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> > would suggest using RELEASE instead of LATEST in this particular case 
>>>>>> > as
>>>>>> > that seems closer to what you want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> > Can you post the maven-metadata.xml for this artifact from you repo
>>>>>> >> manager to a pastebin?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Here: http://pastebin.com/uNpJMXQM
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks. There's no <latest> element in this file (or <release> for that
>>>>>> > matter, so forget what I said above about RELEASE until you can figure
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> > out). Compare with
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sling/maven-launchpad-plugin/maven-metadata.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, that sheds some light on things. So the maven-metadata needs
>>>>>> to explicitly define <latest> and <release>. My impression was that
>>>>>> the artifact resolution process would resolve he latest snapshot (and
>>>>>> release) version by simply examining the <versions> element.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Now the question is how does the <latest> and <release> get there. And
>>>>>> that,
>>>>>> > as you say, is a Maven question. What repository manager are you using?
>>>>>> How
>>>>>> > are you doing releases?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently no repository manager at all; the metadata.xml file I posted
>>>>>> was from my local ~/.m2. Again, I thought a simple mvn install/deploy
>>>>>> would update the metadata with what I need.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So are the <latest> and <release> elements actually proprietary to
>>>>>> some repository managers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vidar-
>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look into this further, but I just remembered
>>>>> something. I seem to recall that <latest> and <release> were only set on a
>>>>> remote repository, not in the local repository. You don't need a 
>>>>> repository
>>>>> manager, just a place you can copy files to (typically via HTTP, SCP, or
>>>>> file://). Repository managers have other things going for them, but SCP +
>>>>> Apache has served me well in the past as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Give this a shot.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Justin, it doesn't seem to be set on my remote repository
>>>> either. Someone told me to use -DupdateReleaseInfo=true, but that only
>>>> set <release> to a snapshot version.
>>>>
>>>> I'll look further into it, thanks a lot for your help.
>>>> (One problem of googling for Maven solutions is that you get all these
>>>> hits from pages GENERATED by Maven ... sigh)
>>>
>>> I was explained on [email protected] [1] that <latest> is only
>>> set for plugins, which explains why it never was updated for my
>>> bundles.
>> Hmmm. This doesn't appear to be the case:
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sling/org.apache.sling.event/maven-metadata.xml
>>
>> But either way, it doesn't work, so it should be fixed.
>>
>>>
>>> As suggested by Benjamin in that thread, I tried specifying a version
>>> range of [0,) instead of LATEST, which then causes an NPE:
>>> ava.lang.NullPointerException: version was null for
>>> com.idium.kolibri:kolibri-cache-util
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.maven.artifact.DefaultArtifact.getBaseVersion(DefaultArtifact.java:390)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.layout.DefaultRepositoryLayout.pathOf(DefaultRepositoryLayout.java:47)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.DefaultArtifactRepository.pathOf(DefaultArtifactRepository.java:110)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:141)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:90)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.sling.maven.projectsupport.AbstractBundleListMojo.getArtifact(AbstractBundleListMojo.java:196)
>>>
>>> Should I register this as a bug with maven-launchpad-plugin?

>> Please do. I've almost got this fixed, so if you don't, I'll have to
>> before committing it :)

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Justin Edelson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually, I'll create the issue. It's fixed locally.

Great :)

-- 
Vidar S. Ramdal <[email protected]> - http://www.idium.no
Sommerrogata 13-15, N-0255 Oslo, Norway
+ 47 22 00 84 00
Quando omni flunkus moritatus!

Reply via email to