How do I unsubscribe from this list?

Thanks,
John


On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Justin Edelson wrote:

>
>
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 09.11.2011 um 17:53 schrieb Justin Edelson:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not in favor of abandoning the DavEx->Sling Auth integration this
>>> for two reasons: 1) as Carsten noted in one of his JIRA comments,
>>> there are browser-based DavEx applications which depend upon Sling
>>> Authentication to work seamlessly and 2) we lose out on the use of the
>>> AuthenticationInfoPostProcessor infrastructure.
>>
>> Agreed. Which I come to the same conclusion (not abandoning Sling's nice 
>> stuff)
>>
>>>
>>> In addition, I suspect that while the requirements of the DavEx
>>> servlet with respect to Sling Authentication are not entirely unique
>>> and that *if* there are changes required in Sling Authentication to
>>> support the DavEx servlet will benefit other use cases.
>>
>> Well, there is a unique "feature" which is called "missing-auth-mapping". I 
>> am not entirely sure, that I want to add support for such functionality. 
>> Because in essence, this would just replace one "anonymous" user with 
>> another one (with maybe the added functionality of being able to disable 
>> that user...).
>>
>>>
>>> I'm convinced the problems are entirely solvable and I'm not ready to
>>> throw in the towel quite yet. I may change my mind :)
>>
>> Do we have something else (other than the missing-auth-mapping stuff) ?
>
> Tests :)
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>>>
>>> That said, as a short term solution to the issue Markus is having, I'm
>>> perfectly fine with rollback SLING-2167, reapply the change described
>>> in SLING-2256, and releasing DavEx 1.1.0.
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The price to pay is, that authentication for this does not go through 
>>>> Sling and does not benefit from Sling's central configuration and setup.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Markus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>


________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by 
return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.

Reply via email to