Ah, thanks. What is a DS component?
Yes, I am working with CQ5.4 com.day.cq.dam.impl.DamAdapterFactory , which isn't exported. And, no source code is provided. http://repo.adobe.com/nexus/content/groups/public/com/day/cq/dam/cq-dam-core/5.4.0/cq-dam-core-5.4.0.pom So, I am not sure if I can get an instance of DamAdapterFactory and call .getAdapter() directly. Also, I'm pretty sure the adapter shipped with CQ5.4 is older than 2.0.12. I'll check if I can upgrade adapter. Probably I'll have to find places where resource.adaptTo(Foo.class) is called and update with new Bar(resource.adaptTo(Foo.class)) . On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Justin Edelson <jus...@justinedelson.com>wrote: > Sam- > Are you saying that there's is already something which adapts Resource -> > Foo? And you can't change that class? > > If so, this class needs to reference that existing AdapterFactory DIRECTLY > rather than via the AdapterManager. This is easy enough to do with a DS > component. > > Regarding your service.ranking issue, check what version of the adapter > bundle you are using. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2468 > > Justin > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Sam Lee <skyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just want to extend Foo and FooFactory so that Bar (which extends Foo) > > will be supplied in some cases.. > > Simple concept.. hard to do in Sling, I guess. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ryan Lunka <ryan.lu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I see a couple things going on here… > > > > > > First, I think the reason you are going to see an infinite recursion > > > situation is because you haven't defined HOW Resource will adapt to > Foo. > > > All the AdapterFactory should do is take an Object and a class and > > create > > > a new Object of that Class FROM the adaptable Object you passed in. > That > > > means you need to have a way to create a Foo out of a Resource, if you > > want > > > to adapt the latter to the former. The simplest example is by adding a > > Foo > > > constructor that takes Resource (i.e. "return (AdapterType) new > > > Foo(adaptable)" where adaptable is a Resource). If you cannot change > the > > > Foo class, there are probably a variety of other ways to handle it. > > > > > > Second, the "if some condition" logic to occasionally return Bar does > not > > > belong in this AdapterFactory. The AdapterFactory should probably only > > be > > > responsible for converting one Object to a certain Class. Logic > > > determining WHAT that Class should be, belongs elsewhere, in whatever > > code > > > is calling the adaptTo() function. What you'll probably want to > > implement > > > as an AdapterFactory that can adapt Resource to both Foo or Bar, > > depending > > > on what class gets called in. Then your "if some condition" logic > should > > > call resource.adaptTo() passing in either of those classes. > > > > > > Third, the service may not be registered, and that's why it's not > getting > > > called on resource.adaptTo(). Try using > > > @Server(value=AdapterFactory.class). > > > > > > Hope this helps. Adaptables are not very clearly documented (in my > > > opinion), so I'm curious if anyone else has feedback as well. It > helped > > me > > > quite a bit to look at some of the Adaptable and AdatperFactory > > > implementations in the Sling code base. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ryan D. Lunka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Sam Lee <skyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > Given > > > > public class Bar implements Foo { > > > > ... > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to provide AdapterFactory that returns Bar instance when > > > > resource.adaptTo(Foo.class) is called. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my attempt: > > > > =>8= > > > > @Component(metatype = false, immediate = true) > > > > @Service > > > > @Properties({ > > > > @Property(name = SlingConstants.PROPERTY_ADAPTABLE_CLASSES, value > = > > > > {"org.apache.sling.api.resource.Resource"}), > > > > @Property(name = SlingConstants.PROPERTY_ADAPTER_CLASSES, value = > > > > {"com.example.Foo"}), > > > > @Property(name = "service.ranking", intValue = -1)//this doesn't > > seem > > > > to be observed > > > > }) > > > > public class MyAdaptToFoo implements AdapterFactory { > > > > @Override > > > > public <AdapterType> AdapterType getAdapter(Object adaptable, > > > > Class<AdapterType> type) { > > > > final Resource resource = (Resource) adaptable; > > > > final Foo foo = resource.adaptTo(Foo.class);//I don't want > > > infinite > > > > recursion here. > > > > if (someCondition) { > > > > final Bar bar = new Bar(foo); > > > > return (AdapterType) bar; > > > > } > > > > return (AdapterType) foo; > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > =>8= > > > > > > > > first of all, that adapter factory doesn't get called when > > > > resource.adaptTo(Foo.class); is called.. > > > > Even if MyAdaptToFoo gets called, I don't want infinite recursion > when > > > its > > > > .getAdapter() calls resource.adaptTo(Foo.class). > > > > > > > > The reason why I'm doing this is because I have a massive code base > > that > > > > uses resource.adaptTo(Foo.class).. and I need to augment Foo (with > Bar) > > > in > > > > some cases. > > > > > > > > Is this possible? > > > > > > > > >
