----- "Ludovic Marcotte" <lmarco...@inverse.ca> wrote: > Gavin Henry wrote: > > I would tend to disagree with that. It has a draft RFC, but the code > is solid > > and is used by lots of companies and organisations. > > > Most of the error codes in the control object have changed across > releases. We've tried 5-6 releases since 2.3.X and we've got > different > error codes with the same calls each time. It has stabilized since > 2.4.17 and I wouldn't call that a non-changing target if our tests > haven't proven otherwise. > > There is a big difference in using the ldap tools (ldapsearch, > ldapmodify, etc.) and linking to the OpenLDAP libraries.
Hmmm, that's strange I can't see one bug report or post from you on the OpenLDAP lists and my archives go back 6 years. Did you ever try to talk about this with us or provide any feedback at the devel level? Thanks, Gavin -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghe...@suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ Suretec Systems is a limited company registered in Scotland. Registered number: SC258005. Registered office: 24 Cormack Park, Rothienorman, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire, AB51 8GL. Subject to disclaimer at http://www.suretecgroup.com/disclaimer.html
-- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
