Le jeudi 26 août 2010 à 02:43 +0200, Martin Lehmann a écrit : > +1 > > Group memberships for constraints would be really great. > Now, I've to set an ldap-attribute for every user and feature. > > Maybe you want for file a feature request for this: > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/bug_report_page.php
Bug opened: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=778 I hope the request is clear enough, english is not my native language ;) Regards, Daniel > > Greetz, > Martin > > Am 25.08.2010 19:52, schrieb Daniel Berteaud: > > Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 16:32 +0800, James Andrewartha a écrit : > > > >> I'm in a similar position, except I wanted to not list certain users in the > >> address book. I just moved the SOGo users into a new ou=calstaff located > >> inside ou=People, and told SOGo to use ou=calstaff,ou=People as the search > >> base. By relying on the DIT structure it is a gross hack, but it works. > >> Other LDAP things still work fine because they default to search scope=sub. > > Unfortunately, I cannot move some of my users in a different ou as my > > LDAP database is auto-generated (I'm using SME Server distro, which is > > really great BTW). > > > > I think the only solution would be some changes in SOGo, and that > > constraints can use group membership in addition to simple LDAP filters. > > > > > > Regards, Daniel > > > > > > > pièce jointe document texte brut (message-footer.txt) > -- > users@sogo.nu > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Mail: dan...@firewall-services.com Web : http://www.firewall-services.com
-- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
