1. Experts from #linux and #ubuntu say that it is not good to force samba4-clients - might be a problem in the future 2. There is not such switch like --force-conflicts in dpkg on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
I came such a long way here, i want to move on. And I believe people are piling up in queues behind me. Please help. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Netwo Dist <netwod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. Well, whatever the previous samba versions are I do not want to > know anything about them, I do not and will never have them installed. Only > samba4 on my server. So that's ok then I will ignore them. > > acl_xattr.so is only necessary for file sharing - well, I do want file > sharing. Didn't quite understand this line? It's optional for file sharing > since you said to ignore this msg even if I use file sharing. > > Thank you. > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Christian Mack < > christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote: > >> Am 2013-02-11 11:09, schrieb Netwo Dist: >> > I thought this installation is tested to work as sogo install docs say? >> > It all means I can not use your software, can :( >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jean Raby <jr...@inverse.ca >> > <mailto:jr...@inverse.ca>> wrote: >> > >> > On 13-02-10 6:13 PM, Netwo Dist wrote: >> > > Okay, thank you, thats shall sort smbclient issue. >> > > But how about the more important one above with acl_xattr.so ? >> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696838 >> > > >> >> Did you read that bug report? >> >> It says: >> "The vfs modules aren't used by the ntvfs file server that the Samba 4 >> package uses at the moment. The warnings during provision are spurious >> and shouldn't happen. That said, while we could fix those warnings to no >> longer occur, we really should move over to the main Samba file server >> ("smbd") once it is updated to a recent upstream version. >> >> We shouldn't include the vfs modules in the samba 4 package - they're >> already (albeit an older version) included in the 'samba' package and >> they're not actually necessary for the current samba4 file server. >> " >> >> I read this as: >> This ony occures spurious. >> And this acl_xattr.so is only necessary for file sharing. >> And this error message can be ignored even if you use that. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Christian Mack >> >> -- >> Christian Mack >> Gruppe Informationsdienste >> Rechenzentrum Universität Konstanz >> -- >> users@sogo.nu >> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists >> > > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
