Am 01.12.2014 um 14:33 schrieb Ben Webber: > Hi Ludovic, > > I've been trying to build the latest code using the spec file from the > srpm in the repo I was using so I could test it for you, but it does not > seem to work. It comes up with errors about invalid rpaths. I have > attached the spec file I used if you want to take a look. > > I took a look at the spec file for 2.2.10 for el5 and noticed it had: > > QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT=1 > export QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT > > in the install section, so I tried adding that to the spec file I was > using, but it just came up with file not found errors on the same files > that I was getting the invalid rpath errors on before. > > Ben > > > > On 30/11/14 23:11, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Good time on the SAML testing. Pretty much all outstanding SAML >> issues/limitations were fixed (see >> http://sogo.nu/bugs/changelog_page.php?version_id=149 for details) last >> week and testing is required. >> >> Are you in a position to try nightly builds? There are none right now >> for CentOS/RHEL 7 but you could probably build your own easily using the >> srpm from the repo you use. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On 30/11/2014 02:38, Ben Webber wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have just joined this list and am a new user to SOGo. Thanks for a >>> great piece of software! I have also just got it set up with saml sso. >>> On setting this up I encountered a few issues. One was addressed in this >>> post: >>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/users@sogo.nu/msg19097.html >>> >>> I could not reply to this message as I was not a member of the list when >>> it was sent, so I am sending this message instead. I am running on >>> CentOS 7. I used this repository to get the packages: >>> >>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jaile/sogo/ >>> >>> I, like the others who have appeared to have done this, used this page >>> for guidance (it is in French): >>> >>> http://wiki.auf.org/wikiteki/Projet/SOGo/TestsSAML >>> >>> I needed to make the modifications described to lasso, but the patch >>> file that is linked on that page however is for lasso 2.3.6 and I am >>> using lasso 2.4.0 (this was provided by the repository linked above). I >>> am not a developer, but I have gone through the diff file and applied >>> the changes in it by hand to the 2.4.0 codebase for lasso and made a few >>> other changes so that it would compile. This was just guesswork so be >>> warned, but it seems to work so I have attached the diff to this email >>> for anybody else if they want to see it. >>> >>> I also needed to make a change to the dovecot code so that there was >>> enough room in the input buffer for the saml assertion when it is >>> received from crudesaml. This was that I needed change >>> LOGIN_MAX_INBUF_SIZE to 4096 in src/login-common/client-common.h >>> >>> Hope this helps someone else anyway, >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. >>> www.surfcontrol.com >> >> It looks like the problem I had: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2996
*g Sven -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
