On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Ingram <sbing...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Stephen Ingram <sbing...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Stephen Ingram <sbing...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Ludovic Marcotte <users@sogo.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-05-16 21:57, Stephen Ingram (sbing...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It appears as though maybe there is a new package I'm missing, or does
>>>> this not work in version 3 yet?
>>>>
>>>> Does it work with the exact same configuration in v2? That code is
>>>> unchanged in v3 and should work as-is.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. The only thing I really see of any difference is that many of the
>>> packages for CentOS 7 are included in the CentOS repository and are of a
>>> different version that the one's in the Inverse CentOS 6 repository I have
>>> on the working unit. I also turned on debugging and it acts like I'm
>>> missing a SAML variable while I have the exact same config as on the
>>> working one:
>>>
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: [ERROR] [so-action 0x0x7fe3ae6019c0
>>> SOGoSAML2Actions] did not find method 'SOGoSAML2Actions'
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: |SOGo|   traverse miss:
>>> name=saml2-metadata, acquire: i=1,count=2
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: |SOGo|     miss is last object.
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: |SOGo|     got no error for miss.
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: |SOGo| Note: next object is nil, but
>>> currentObject is not callable: <SOGo[0x0x7fe3ae6111c0]: name=SOGo>
>>> May 16 23:27:50 sogod [20901]: |SOGo| request took 0.002337 seconds to
>>> execute
>>>
>>
>> There's something missing. Comparing the version that is working (2.x)
>> with the one that is not (3.x) there is a difference in lasso packages.
>> With 2.x I have also lasso-perl installed, but not with 3.x since there is
>> no package. Is this necessary or is something missing from SOGo MainUI
>> itself where SOGoSAML2Actions is supposed to be?
>>
>
> I could certainly be wrong, but I really think this is missing part of the
> package as I'm not sure why else the error log would say "did not find
> method". I have opened a bug for this.
>

Ludovic-

Your fix for 3.1.1 seems to have done the trick. Works again. Thanks.

Steve
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Reply via email to