I would think it would be as simple as deleting the update handler from your 
solrconfig on the search servers

> On Jun 10, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> What problem are you trying to solve with this?
> 
> Are you trying to send queries to less loaded machines? If so, this won’t do 
> that.
> Leaders only do a little bit more work than followers. All indexing 
> processing is local
> and that is most of the CPU usage.
> 
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> [email protected]
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
> 
>> On Jun 10, 2021, at 9:41 AM, Stephen Lewis Bianamara 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Community,
>> 
>> I checked the source and see that this doesn't look to be supported to read
>> only from followers. I guess this is possible by pulling the state.json
>> data from zookeeper, identifying the leaders, and then passing an explicit
>> whitelist not including the leaders. Can someone confirm that this is the
>> only way to accomplish this goal?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 1:55 PM Stephen Lewis Bianamara <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> 
>>> Is it possible to configure a Solr cloud to serve reads only from the
>>> followers? I see this page
>>> <https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/distributed-requests.html> explains
>>> how to prefer by local, replica type, or sysprops. But is it possible to
>>> specify that something should be served by a non-leader whenever possible
>>> (or even require it to return at all)? E.g., something like
>>> 
>>> shards.preference=leader:false
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stephen
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to