Hi Jan, Cam you please help on how to implement SpanFirstQuery in Solr. Is there any documentation available?? Stuck with implementation.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021, 10:53 pm Thamizhazhagan B, <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Jan. Will look upon the documentation. > > Moreover, the query has starts with (^) operator. The problem is that some > keywords are working fine with the same query. Some keywords are not. > > We observed that some keywords are rendered at top though it presents as > second word in a title (For.Ex: Test Culture). But we are looking for title > has keyword as fist word should come at first (For ex: Culture <following > by other text>. We tried to use 'sow=false". But no luck. > > Thanks, > Thamizh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 12:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Priorities for fields and Phrases while indexing > > There is no «starts with» operator. Please read the documentation. You may > be able to simulate starts with by looking into SpanFirstQuery. Or by > creating a custom field type, see > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!6nuIotIgrsRVm-VwLaF-nvAPgILEyJ1BCek5G5TrC2lFFjlCuDETevc8Yu4Y_YlkYVnt4Q$ > > Jan Høydahl > > > 24. sep. 2021 kl. 17:08 skrev Thamizhazhagan B < > [email protected]>: > > > > Thanks Jan. We were able to achieve boosting. > > > > However, when we are applying boost value for "Starts with" to keyword > > (For.Example: culture), solr brings the result set wherever the > > keyword presents but top results are contains the keyword as second > > word > > > > Query: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://localhost/solr/TestIndex/select?bq > > =(name_t:*5C*5Eculture)*5E10&bq=(desc_t:*5C*5Eculture)*5E20&q=((((medi > > acontent_t:culture*AND*categorytype_t:Testdoc)**A-)*OR*((bodycontent_t > > :(culture)*AND*_templatename:(*22XXX*22))**A-))*AND*haslayout_b:(true) > > )&defType=edismax&hl.simple.post=**A3C*span*3E*&hl.maxAnalyzedChars=20 > > 0000&hl.fl=bodycontent_t,mediacontent_t&fl=name_t,desc_title_t,score&r > > ows=1000__;JSUlJSUlKysrKysrKyslJSsrKysrJS8lKw!!BZ50a36bapWJ!6nuIotIgrs > > RVm-VwLaF-nvAPgILEyJ1BCek5G5TrC2lFFjlCuDETevc8Yu4Y_Yl6q-zZwg$ > > > > Current result: (Data security reasons - mentioned 'xxx' for project > > specific key words) > "response":{"numFound":13788,"start":0,"maxScore":130.9114,"docs":[ > > { > > "name":"xxx Culture", > > "score":130.9114}, > > { > > "name":"Culture, xxx", > > "score":130.86884}, > > { > > "name":" xxx Culture", > > "score":130.68527}, > > { > > "name":" xxx Culture", > > "score":130.67133}, > > { > > "name":"Culture, xxx ", > > "score":130.25258}, > > { > > "name":"Culture, xxx ", > > "score":130.20874}, > > { > > "name":" xxx Culture", > > "score":130.17592}, > > { > > name":"Culture, xxx", > > "score":129.13066}, > > > > > > Expected result: wherever 'Culture' as first word should come at first. > Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 8:45 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Priorities for fields and Phrases while indexing > > > > Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open > attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Please do not cross-post to several lists. This question belongs here in > the users-list only. > > > > You could yse EDismax parser to achieve different boosts per field, > > see the "qf" parameter in > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_9/the-exte > > nded-dismax-query-parser.html__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!4RDXbrNeBH3xqDT3jtfUsAr > > 99Z4yB-J7LiYK0-FysA9TWQL7ysveHJz3mj3mU3SXHrVoLA$ > > > > If a user types "test phrase", Solr will by default require a pure > phrase match. > > You could rewrite that query in your application to something like "test > phrase" or (test phrase)^0.2 to achieve what you are after. However, users > may be puzzled that they did not get the phrase they were looking for? > > > > Jan > > > >> 22. sep. 2021 kl. 14:27 skrev Thamizh Babu <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am new to SOLR. We have a requirement to prioritize fields and > keyword phrases as below: > >> > >> While indexing priority as below > >> Title - Priority 1 > >> Short Desc - Priority 2 > >> Long Desc - Priority 3 > >> > >> If user types search phrase like “Test Phrase” > >> “Test Phrase” – Priority 1 > >> “Test” – Priority 2 > >> “Phrase” – Priority 3 > >> > >> Please guide us how to give priority while indexing time for above use > cases. Any help would be highly appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Thamizh > >> > >> Sent from Mail > >> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId= > >> 550986__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!4RDXbrNeBH3xqDT3jtfUsAr99Z4yB-J7LiYK0-FysA9TW > >> QL7ysveHJz3mj3mU3TY1MfWjg$ > for Windows > >> > >> > >> < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!4RDXbrNeBH3xqDT3jtfUsAr99Z4yB-J7LiYK0-FysA9TWQL7ysveHJz3mj3mU3TWoUnXAA$ > > Virus-free. > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.avast.com__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!4RDXbrNeBH3xqDT3jtfUsAr99Z4yB-J7LiYK0-FysA9TWQL7ysveHJz3mj3mU3R2il159A$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient__;!!BZ50a36bapWJ!4RDXbrNeBH3xqDT3jtfUsAr99Z4yB-J7LiYK0-FysA9TWQL7ysveHJz3mj3mU3TWoUnXAA$ > > > <x-msg://4/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this > e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or > disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this > e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. > v.173.295 Thank you. >
