The take away is that greater than zero and less than 1 values, such as
0.1, will down boost a document.

    Erik

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021, 06:13 Amrit Sarkar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you Jan, Sayanti, Govind.
>
> Amrit Sarkar
> Engineer | Search and Kubernetes
> https://seamadic.com/
> Twitter https://twitter.com/sarkaramrit2
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
> Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:39 PM govind nitk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > @Jan, @Sayanti
> > Thanks for the insights.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:24 PM sayanti dey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Scorer must produce positive scores (LUCENE-7996
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996>)
> > >
> > > Scorers are no longer allowed to produce negative scores. If you have
> > > custom query implementations, you should make sure their score formula
> > may
> > > never produce negative scores.
> > >
> > > As a side-effect of this change, negative boosts are now rejected and
> > > FunctionScoreQuery maps negative values to 0.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:16 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think it may be related to
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > > >
> > > > > 1. okt. 2021 kl. 08:14 skrev Amrit Sarkar <[email protected]
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi fellow users,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not able to locate any JIRA for removal of "Using Negative
> > Boost"
> > > in
> > > > > Solr 8.4, nor any discussion around the same. I will be grateful if
> > > > someone
> > > > > points me to the right direction to any conversation around it such
> > > that
> > > > we
> > > > > understand the motivation and work around in our project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Amrit Sarkar
> > > > > Engineer | Search and Kubernetes
> > > > > Twitter https://twitter.com/sarkaramrit2
> > > > > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
> > > > > Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to