ok, makes sense, thank you for looking into it.

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:24 AM Alessandro Benedetti <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
> org.apache.solr.ltr.feature.Feature.FeatureWeight.FeatureScorer#score
> returns a float that is the feature value (public abstract float score()) .
>
> Having a feature that actually wraps multiple features is not implemented
> and would require non trivial changes in the module.
>
> Cheers
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 May 2023 at 18:57, Rajani Maski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Does LTR field value feature or solr feature  support multi valued
> numeric
> > field? Thinking of storing document features in single multi valued field
> > or serialized string format. Can LTR reranker consume from such a field?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajani
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2023, 1:53 PM Rajani Maski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Solr Users,
> > >
> > >  Can the LTR field value feature
> > > <
> >
> https://solr.apache.org/docs/8_7_0/solr-ltr/org/apache/solr/ltr/feature/FieldValueFeature.html
> >
> > be
> > > a vector field or a field with comma separated numeric values? Is it a
> > > supported feature?  Instead of querying each field separately, which is
> > > adding up to the query cost, thinking if it is possible to put field
> > values
> > > together in one field at index time and query that as a feature,
> > thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rajani
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to