Hi Karl, The mail thread mentions pre-existing issue refs that might be the cause, but they're not very enlightening on their own.
Does this link for the mail archive work for you? https://lists.apache.org/thread/b717gcmjj92vxgq48g4ho8wct3zm4rct Thomas Op do 18 apr 2024 08:34 schreef Karl Stoney <karl.sto...@autotrader.co.uk.invalid>: > Hi Thomas, > That link doesn’t seem to work for me (might be that my corporate AV is > messing with it as it rewrites it to some outlook safe link!) – do you have > an issue ref? > > We’re trying to go to 9.5.0, which is the latest. > > From: Thomas Corthals <tho...@klascement.net> > Date: Wednesday, 17 April 2024 at 16:49 > To: users@solr.apache.org <users@solr.apache.org> > Cc: Michael Eves <michael.e...@autotrader.co.uk>, Craig Wrigglesworth < > craig.wriggleswo...@autotrader.co.uk> > Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field > Hi Karl, > > What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to? > > This sounds very similar to this issue: > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Flist%3Fusers%40solr.apache.org%3Agte%3D0d%3A%26header_subject%3DInvalid%2520JSON%2520response%2520with%2520UUID%2520field&data=05%7C02%7CKarl.Stoney%40autotrader.co.uk%7Cd4aa4ec734fa44913fc508dc5ef6004f%7C926f3743f3d24b8a816818cfcbe776fe%7C0%7C0%7C638489657913634950%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7VmK3hGPAZLiGk90tj5SHGzGVc62i56rkTNidVjXmVM%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://lists.apache.org/list?users@solr.apache.org:gte=0d:&header_subject=Invalid%20JSON%20response%20with%20UUID%20field > > > > Thomas > > Op wo 17 apr 2024 om 16:55 schreef Karl Stoney > <karl.sto...@autotrader.co.uk.invalid>: > > > Hi, > > I’m currently looking into the solr 8 -> solr 9 upgrade, and we’ve > noticed > > that if a document is using a binary field, the json returned is invalid > > because the value is not quoted: > > > > For example on solr 8 we’d see: > > > > ``` > > "STOCK_ITEM_BINARY_FIELD":”OikKAfqEdXJzSWRjNTEwMj…” > > ``` > > > > But on solr 8 we get back: > > > > ``` > > "STOCK_ITEM_BINARY_FIELD":OikKAfqEdXJzSWRjNTEwMj… > > ``` > > > > (note both these examples are observed through the Solr UI too): > > > > This feels like a bug, but wanted to check here before I raised it as > one? > > > > > > Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on > > behalf of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place, > > Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628). > Auto > > Trader Limited is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email and > > any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally > > privileged, and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity > to > > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > > notify the sender. This email message has been swept for the presence of > > computer viruses. > > > > > Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on > behalf of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place, > Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628). Auto > Trader Limited is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email and > any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally > privileged, and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > notify the sender. This email message has been swept for the presence of > computer viruses. >
