Hi
This is a header of a mail sent via Lotus Notes and I noticed no false
positives from Lotus Notes
I running Spamassassin 2.63 with some ruleset from SARE and Amavisd-new
/ Max
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.12 February 13, 2003
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:44:08 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on XXX02/XXXXX/XX(Release 5.0.12 |February
13, 2003) at
2004-09-10 13:44:10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by Cleanmail at kringdata.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 tagged_above=-50.0 required=6.5 tests=AWL,
BAYES_00, KD_MVH, NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 13:02, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Would you care to share an example with SA headers?
Sadly not possible as these emails are getting rejected, we reject
anything with a spam score over 10. So no I don't have the headers, but
they are all happening to the same organisation and they are all lotus
notes users.
Ron
Ron McKeating wrote:
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients
using lotus notes ?
Ron